Sometimes you just don’t have the time or resources to meticulously test your blast emails, but that doesn’t mean you can’t maximize your results with proven tactics. Here are some simple tips that I think smaller, and medium sized campaigns and organizations can put in place, right now, to improve their blast emails. 1. You have to make it matter. One of the biggest mistakes writers make is not relating the importance of what they are asking supporters to do.
Facebook conducted two experiments with Democratic Senate campaigns this year to see if advertisements on its site encouraged people to make political contributions. The company says the results show it did. But because some of the processes the company used are opaque and because online fund-raising can be influenced by offline factors, a number of questions remain unanswered.
For all those refcode-happy committees, this feature’s for you! Now you search for a specific refcode on the Contribution Form statistics page. There are two ways to get to that page (and both require you to be logged in): if you’re already on your Contribution Form, go to the Contributors tab, and click on “View Form Statistics” or just insert your Contribution Form name into the url below: secure.actblue.com/pages/CONTRIBUTION_FORM_NAME/statistics To try out the new feature, just type in all or part of the refcode you want to see, and you’ll find only those refcodes that match your search.
Tweeting in English and Spanish? Here are some quick tips to help you avoid all-too-common pitfalls: DO know your audience. The best way to know your audience is to be part of their community. And when that happens, Twitter is an excellent platform to engage with people and organizations in the language that works best for them. Remember: just because someone’s background includes a Spanish-speaking country or they speak Spanish, it doesn’t mean Spanish is their preferred language for Twitter or news content. For instance, if you assume that you must tweet in Spanish if you want to reach Latinos, you may not get you the results you are looking for.
It may not be Dick Clark official, but it’s true nonetheless: 2015 is upon us. With it comes new budget cycles, fundraising goals, and election countdowns. As you look to what your organization should be doing online in 2015, consider these five crucial arenas where you can immediately make an impact: 1. Responsive design is now a requirement. In 2014 mobile internet usage exceeded desktop for the first time. Around 17% of donations on Giving Tuesday came from mobile devices.
In an attempt at levity, FOX & Friends launched a campaign to ring out the old year using the hashtag #Overit2014. And while many of us in the social media world already know to be wary of backfiring hashtags if you are a controversial organization, the wiz-kids at FOX & Friends apparently do not. In response to their hashtag, Twitter erupted with tweets that blasted FOX News and the conservative movement it champions (and a week later, the eruption continues, still). This prompted me to take a deeper look at the political and advocacy hashtags of 2014 to see what they reveal about the year that was.
Much like a vanity license plate, vanity metrics are abbreviated statements with no backstory—they tend to be “wow”-inducing without adding real substance. While usually brandished to show improvement via time-lapse graphs that incline steeply, they are seldom entirely accurate or informative.
If the 2008 election represented the birth of broad digital organizing, it looked like digital might grow up in 2014, but what we actually saw was an awkward teenager reaching some new heights while clumsily knocking things over. Here’s what worked in digital in 2014—and what didn’t.
Understanding what makes people tick is key to any marketing strategy. Our latest illustrated guide reveals how to tap into emotions and build trust with your audience — just by choosing the right colors, words and images for your online communications.
Barack Obama’s reelection campaign pioneered a pathway for political campaigns to reach voters through Facebook when it released an app that helped supporters target their friends with Obama-related material. But as the 2016 presidential campaign approaches, Facebook is rolling out a change that will prevent future campaigns from doing this, closing the door on one of the most sophisticated social targeting efforts ever undertaken. “It’s a fairly significant shift,” said Teddy Goff, who was Obama’s digital director in 2012, and oversaw the effort that helped the Obama campaign gain a Facebook following of 45 million users that year. Goff’s team used Facebook and other tools to register more than a million voters online and to raise $690 million online in 2011 and 2012.
At some point in the next two years, the pollsters and ad makers who steer American presidential campaigns will be stumped: The nightly tracking polls are showing a dramatic swing in the opinions of the electorate, but neither of two typical factors — huge news or a major advertising buy — can explain it. They will, eventually, realize that the viral, mass conversation about politics on Facebook and other platforms has finally emerged as a third force in the core business of politics, mass persuasion. Facebook is on the cusp — and I suspect 2016 will be the year this becomes clear — of replacing television advertising as the place where American elections are fought and won. The vast new network of some 185 million Americans opens the possibility, for instance, of a congressional candidate gaining traction without the expense of television, and of an inexpensive new viral populism. The way people share will shape the outcome of the presidential election. Even during the 2014 midterms, which most Americans ignored, Facebook says it saw 43 million unique individuals engage in the political conversation.
Spending on TV ads in this election is predicted to top $1 billion for the first time in a mid-term, according to the Wesleyan Media Project. Apple, the world's biggest brand, spent about $350 million advertising phones last year. So why does everyone love their iPhone but hate their member of Congress? Do you think Apple would put up with a 14 percent positive rating like Congress has? To put it bluntly, there's too much money in campaigns now not to take rigorous advantage of the best thinking in commercial branding. Unfortunately, many of the Democratic campaigns that raised so much small-dollar money online this cycle could use more branding expertise.
As we analyze this election and start to hone in on the things that went really well, one of the brightest spots is the continued rise of the small-dollar donor. We didn’t just have a big cycle here at ActBlue we had a HUGE one. I’m talking nearly double 2012. The increase in donations (98.3% growth compared to the 2012 cycle!!) is way higher than the growth in the number of number of campaigns and organizations using ActBlue (11.8% increase). Everyone’s raising a lot more grassroots money than ever before. It’s awesome. Keep in mind, the overall amount of money spent on Congressional elections is actually fairly stable compared to 2012. That means the overall share of money coming from grassroots donors on the left is increasing.
Here is our list of the worst and best political ads of the year. You can also see my comments on the best and worst political ads of 2014 on C-Span’s Washington Journal. I can’t say this is a non-partisan list, after all we are a Democratic political consulting firm. That said, we were not thrilled with all of the Democratic political ads we saw this year either. Good creative matters more in political ads than it ever has before. This holds true regardless of political party affiliation. With all of the noise that is associated with political campaigns, there are very few good ideas, let alone good political ads, that actually stand out. Whether you are producing digital, mail, radio or television political ads — whether you are a Democrat or Republican — I think we can all agree that we need to strive for better and clearer messaging.
Virtually all of us are dependent on smartphones: if you take a moment to look up from your screen, you’ll probably see dozens of other people completely engrossed in their own. In light of midterm elections today, a recent Pew Research poll highlighted in an article by The Hill revealed that voters are increasingly reliant on smartphones and social media to follow political parties, candidates and election news. The poll, which surveyed 2,003 people from October 15-20, reported that Democrats, Republicans and Independents alike are using their phones and social media platforms to stay informed. According to the article, the number of voters who responded as using their smartphones and those who are using social media has doubled and tripled respectively, compared to data from elections in 2010.
Facebook ran its "voter megaphone" initiative in the United States Tuesday, letting users indicate whether they are voting and see similar messages from their friends, as our Micah Sifry has been covering in detail. But what about the possibility of actually being able to verify that your Facebook friends have voted? That is the functionality made possible through a tool in use over the past week in Oregon, Washington and Colorado. Built by developer Josh Cohen, it lets users check whether their Facebook friends in those states participated in early voting based on ballot data and send them a Facebook message.
As he campaigned with frenzied energy along the Virginia coast on the Sunday before Election Day, with a growing sense that an historic upset was in reach, Ed Gillespie made a curious stop — at a Virginia Beach branch of Buffalo Wild Wings, the sports-bar chain. The Republican Senate candidate wasn’t there to cheer on the Washington Redskins. He was there, amid the framed jerseys of NFL greats and giant-screen TVs, for the sake of Buffalo Wild Wings itself. His digital adviser had crunched the numbers: Buffalo Wild Wings was the second most common Facebook “like” for conservative-leaning independents within his social network — the same kinds of people whom Gillespie desperately needed to get to the polls.
As Colin noted last week, much hay has been made over the Democrats’ End-of-the-Quarter “Email Deluge” concluding on September 30th (though I say “conclude” lightly). We saw accusations of maleficence from Trilogy’s Steve Olson and impassioned appeals to our inner organizer from Rising Tide’s Stephanie Grasmick. Whether dissing or defending, it seems everyone has an opinion, but many of them have been light on data and details. And while it’s easy to say “I don’t like all the email,” it’s equally easy to reply with “But it works!” And does it ever. Organizations like the DCCC, DSCC, and the DNC are setting new fundraising records every quarter. All data points to the fact that more email equals more money and that the tactics they’re employing work quite well. But a closer examination of the details of mass emailing and email deliverability point to two inevitable facts: 1. these “Big Email” programs are potentially damaging the larger Progressive fundraising ecosystem, and 2. the success seen to date can’t possibly last forever.
What makes people click a link on Facebook? The Huffington Post, Upworthy, and other publications that have mastered the art of using a social media curiosity gap to encourage clicks to their content. For example, the headline “How much does most powerful fashion editor earn per year?” creates a curiosity gap to click and find out the answer. (Spoiler: Anna Wintour of Vogue earns $2 million annually.) You may want to apply this strategy for Facebook headlines, but there is at least one case where a curiosity gap will do more harm than good. When asking people to sign a petition, titles with a direct call to action outperform those using a curiosity gap. When CREDO Action created a petition to stop the sale of the Tribune Company to the Koch Brothers, they tested two Facebook titles to see which version would garner the most signers: “The Kochs Are Trying To Buy The Media” and “Sign the petition: The Kochs Are Trying To Buy The Media” The direct title with “Sign the Petition” got 43% more people to click the link and sign the petition than the title without it.
Do you know how to craft the perfect Facebook post? Being on the Facebook News Feed has become as hard as being on Google’s first page. The fierce competition and recent changes in the algorithm are turning this almost impossible, and what makes the difference often times comes down to small details, testing and optimizing every single aspect of your content. TrackMaven analyzed more than 1.5 million pieces of content on 6,000 Pages, here is what they said… “We found that when the various elements of a Facebook post are strategically crafted, the viral reach of posts is extended in the News Feed.” Now, let’s take a look at these different items TrackMaven is calling the nuts and bolts of the perfect Facebook post:
Mandate Media helps progressive political campaigns, nonprofits, and businesses integrate strategy with technology.Learn more about what we do and meet the team. However you're changing the world, we can help you win.
Got questions? Need a quote? Ready to change the world?